Hey Max, Thanks a lot for your very nice words. This is greatly appreciated!
I always see room for improvement, even in a compliment, though :) May I ask, what's the biggest part of jOOQ having its learning curve? Is there anything that you can still recall now, after 2.5 years, that you think could be improved for new users? Can the "JOOQ Way" of doing things be conveyed more easily? Cheers, Lukas 2016-10-28 21:06 GMT+02:00 Max Kremer <[email protected]>: > I just have to say that JOOQ is AWESOME! We've been using it for about 2.5 > years now and it's really a joy to work with. Its a big library and has its > learning curve but it crushes every ORM (or any other lib that wraps JDBC) > out there. Once you get the "JOOQ Way" of doing things it makes for robust, > easy to maintain and readable code. Thanks Lukas for all your hard work and > support. > > -Max > > On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 at 8:16:44 AM UTC-4, Lukas Eder wrote: > >> Dear group, >> >> Part of jOOQ's success is its incredible amount of convenience methods >> that help reduce the boiler plate code at your side. We do this with >> massive overloading of API, for instance, when you work with fetch(), you >> may have noticed how many different types of fetch() there are in jOOQ. >> >> Just now, I have added yet another convenience method. A Converter >> constructor: >> https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/5398 >> >> It looks like this: >> >> static <T, U> Converter<T, U> of( >> Class<T> fromType, >> Class<U> toType, >> Function<? super T, ? extends U> from, >> Function<? super U, ? extends T> to >> ) { ... } >> >> And also: >> >> static <T, U> Converter<T, U> ofNullable( >> Class<T> fromType, >> Class<U> toType, >> Function<? super T, ? extends U> from, >> Function<? super U, ? extends T> to >> ) { >> return of( >> fromType, >> toType, >> t -> t == null ? null : from.apply(t), >> u -> u == null ? null : to.apply(u) >> ); >> } >> >> >> The above allows for creating simple ad-hoc, one-liner converters, such >> as: >> >> Converter<String, Integer> converter = >> Converter.ofNullable(String.class, Integer.class, Integer::parseInt, >> Object::toString); >> >> What's your biggest "itch" in the jOOQ API, which jOOQ could "scratch", >> or rather, make go away by adding new convenience API? >> >> All ideas welcome! >> Lukas >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "jOOQ User Group" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jOOQ User Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
