Hi, For lack of knowing where to post this type of message. Thanks and well done. I am by no means a JOOQ expert - but after doing considerable testing and a small project with it I can definitely commend and recommend JOOQ. It simply feels natural even considering the Java constraints. Like the way you do aliasing - to the point where meta-data type tables and polymorphism can be tackled very differently (simpler and more description in my opinion) to other DB-technologies. There are a lot of good to say apart from these mentioned.
Also, as stated in another thread the only things missing for me are: 1. Different/better schema selection (as part of the query) 2. A Kotlin generator would be really sweet 3. A super fast - near native mapping, mapper to POJO. Thanks for making it open source and giving us the opportunity to use and hopefully contribute to your product - and again - well done. I like what you have done with it. Gawie -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jOOQ User Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
