Hi Taylor, Thanks for your message. Indeed, currently we don't have a meta model type for indexes.
The historic reason for this is that the index meta type doesn't add much value to the generated meta model unlike constraints - at least up until we allowed for re-creating the meta model, e.g. through DSLContext.ddl(). They're on the roadmap for jOOQ 3.10, or perhaps 3.11 if they don't fit in anymore: https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/5638 Hope this helps, Lukas 2017-05-21 0:40 GMT+02:00 Taylor Phillips <[email protected]>: > Hi all, > > I noticed that TableDefinition defines accessors for the primary key, > unique keys, and foreign keys, but does not define an accessor for standard > indices (e.g in mysql `CREATE INDEX idx ON ...`). > > Is that information available elsewhere? Is there a good reason why > TableDefinition doesn't define that accessor? > > Thanks, > Taylor > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "jOOQ User Group" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jOOQ User Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
