Thanks for the feedback, Ralph. I'm glad to hear that you were able to resolve your problem. Some further comments about open questions inline:
2017-08-19 20:25 GMT+02:00 <[email protected]>: > Ah, ok. My composite type is really simple and I don't need nested UDTs or > arrays. Should that work or do you still advice against it? > Yes, because jOOQ does this for free, and any manual deserialisation is just hairy :) (and then, as I firmly believe in Murphy's Law, there will be the day when your composite types will no longer be "really simple") Cheers, Lukas -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jOOQ User Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
