2017-11-17 17:41 GMT+01:00 <[email protected]>: > My schema is dynamic, so I don't have any table-to-class mappings. And > it's not possible to set such forcedType in a DSL config, is it? >
Unfortunately, right now, it isn't - at least not for your particular "plain SQL" / "direct JDBC" usage. The pending feature request is here, I've increased its priority for jOOQ 3.11: https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/4473 If you're willing to patch your jOOQ version, you will be able to implement the feature directly in org.jooq.impl.MetaDataFieldProvider, which creates Field<?> and DataType<?> references from JDBC's java.sql.ResultSetMetaData I hope this helps, Lukas -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jOOQ User Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
