Thanks for your message.

I will answer on Stack Overflow and on GitHub, where this question was
cross-posted:
https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/6896

Cheers,
Lukas

2017-12-07 20:34 GMT+01:00 Stéphane Kahn <[email protected]>:

> Hi,
>
> I think I found a bug in jOOQ generator: previously (3.8.1) it managed to
> create classes for function with same names but different arguments/return,
> e.g.: myfunction() and myfunction(INTEGER).
> It used to generate two classes (Myfunction1.java and Myfunction2.java and
> corresponding records) and everything was fine.
>
> I wanted to upgrade to 3.10.2, but the generator doesn't work anymore in
> such case. It creates one class (Myfunction.java) with duplicated fields. I
> tried with 3.9.1, I get the same result.
>
> Before I realised it is related to functions with same name, I created a
> post on StackOverflow with (slightly) more details:
>
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/47698834/jooq-
> generator-error-variable-already-defined-when-two-functions-have-same-nam
>
> Thank you,
> Stéphane
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "jOOQ User Group" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jOOQ 
User Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to