> On Jul 17, 2019, at 7:49 AM, Lukas Eder <[email protected]> wrote: > <snip> > What other utilities would you like jOOQ to offer out of the box for an > improved jOOQ / Kotlin experience?
Honestly, it’s pretty good as it is… I haven’t felt much friction using Kotlin + jOOQ for the last year. A couple small things nonetheless: - It’d be neat if the generated record types could have their various members explicitly marked as nullable so that they’re `?` types rather than `!` types. However, maybe that can be done by annotating them `@Nullable` — I forget if kotlin’s platform type integration takes that into account. - fetchOne() (or its equivalent extension function) could return `R?` instead of `R!` -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jOOQ User Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jooq-user/968881B1-F851-4AD6-AF4D-E03F141EEEBB%40mpierce.org.
