Yeah, I figured.  No worries, just confirming that it was rolled back.
Plus for anyone who is reading this can easily see the feature was removed
without digging into the code.

On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 1:24 AM Lukas Eder <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Samir,
>
> There are a lot of edge cases related to arrays, user defined types,
> custom data type bindings, etc. So indeed, the feature turned out to cause
> much more trouble than it added value, at least from a maintenance
> perspective.
>
> Thanks,
> Lukas
>
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 11:04 PM Samir Faci <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I'm super late to the party was going to see about using the feature but
>> it looks like this was more complicated than expected?
>>
>> Mostly chiming in for anyone else reading this to see that the feature
>> was rolled back.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 8:07 AM Lukas Eder <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Samir,
>>>
>>> This issue is now implemented in jOOQ 3.12:
>>> https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/5412
>>>
>>> Generated records will now contain mapper() and unmapper() methods that
>>> produce non-reflective RecordMapper and RecordUnmapper instances in case
>>> both records and pojos are being generated.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Lukas
>>>
>>> On Thursday, July 7, 2016 at 4:50:21 AM UTC+2, csgeek wrote:
>>>>
>>>> 1.  One conversion that would be useful to have is the ability to
>>>> convert from POJOs to Records and vice versa.
>>>>
>>>> On occasion I need to roll out my own POJO because our data is
>>>> represented different at the service layer then how the data
>>>> is actually stored, but I find myself using the autogenerated records
>>>> and POJOs a good bit.  It would be nice if there was an easy way to going
>>>> from say:
>>>>
>>>> TableNameRecord  -->  TableName (pojo) and back.
>>>>
>>>> It varies on my use case but I tend to usually fetchInto(  . class) and
>>>> most of the the class passed in is either the record or pojo that was
>>>> generated by jooq.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Samir Faci
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 5:16 AM, Lukas Eder <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Dear group,
>>>>>
>>>>> Part of jOOQ's success is its incredible amount of convenience methods
>>>>> that help reduce the boiler plate code at your side. We do this with
>>>>> massive overloading of API, for instance, when you work with fetch(), you
>>>>> may have noticed how many different types of fetch() there are in jOOQ.
>>>>>
>>>>> Just now, I have added yet another convenience method. A Converter
>>>>> constructor:
>>>>> https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/5398
>>>>>
>>>>> It looks like this:
>>>>>
>>>>>     static <T, U> Converter<T, U> of(
>>>>>         Class<T> fromType,
>>>>>         Class<U> toType,
>>>>>         Function<? super T, ? extends U> from,
>>>>>         Function<? super U, ? extends T> to
>>>>>     ) { ... }
>>>>>
>>>>> And also:
>>>>>
>>>>>     static <T, U> Converter<T, U> ofNullable(
>>>>>         Class<T> fromType,
>>>>>         Class<U> toType,
>>>>>         Function<? super T, ? extends U> from,
>>>>>         Function<? super U, ? extends T> to
>>>>>     ) {
>>>>>         return of(
>>>>>             fromType,
>>>>>             toType,
>>>>>             t -> t == null ? null : from.apply(t),
>>>>>             u -> u == null ? null : to.apply(u)
>>>>>         );
>>>>>     }
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The above allows for creating simple ad-hoc, one-liner converters,
>>>>> such as:
>>>>>
>>>>>     Converter<String, Integer> converter =
>>>>>     Converter.ofNullable(String.class, Integer.class,
>>>>> Integer::parseInt, Object::toString);
>>>>>
>>>>> What's your biggest "itch" in the jOOQ API, which jOOQ could
>>>>> "scratch", or rather, make go away by adding new convenience API?
>>>>>
>>>>> All ideas welcome!
>>>>> Lukas
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "jOOQ User Group" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Thank you
>>>> Samir Faci
>>>> https://keybase.io/csgeek
>>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "jOOQ User Group" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jooq-user/7007e64b-daf1-496a-b7c8-fec78aee6d12%40googlegroups.com
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jooq-user/7007e64b-daf1-496a-b7c8-fec78aee6d12%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Thank you
>> Samir Faci
>> https://keybase.io/csgeek
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "jOOQ User Group" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jooq-user/CAJ7OkQ_c%2BNvU4%2Bj9_44ohX6w-_-tL_7vqewa8tZ5SJT5Ey-j4A%40mail.gmail.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jooq-user/CAJ7OkQ_c%2BNvU4%2Bj9_44ohX6w-_-tL_7vqewa8tZ5SJT5Ey-j4A%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "jOOQ User Group" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jooq-user/CAB4ELO7wSR3QzxEbKvu8gfvG1sBHPsvHyRjGEgOdtPWj-tFKig%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jooq-user/CAB4ELO7wSR3QzxEbKvu8gfvG1sBHPsvHyRjGEgOdtPWj-tFKig%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>


-- 
Thank you
Samir Faci
https://keybase.io/csgeek

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jOOQ 
User Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jooq-user/CAJ7OkQ-Qyd%3D%2Bsg1yagz0Wko3uoY4w74UMJ4uEV4vGjdC1ectiQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to