+1 (if a parameter name change is going to happen anyway) On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 2:24 AM, Vladimir Dzhuvinov / NimbusDS < [email protected]> wrote:
> +1 > > -- > Vladimir Dzhuvinov : www.NimbusDS.com : [email protected] > > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: [jose] xpo > From: Richard Barnes <[email protected]> > Date: Wed, October 17, 2012 12:15 am > To: "Manger, James H" <[email protected]> > Cc: Mike Jones <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" > <[email protected]> > > > +1 > > On Oct 16, 2012, at 6:55 PM, Manger, James H wrote: > > >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-jose-json-web-key-06 > >> • Changed the name of the JWK RSA exponent parameter from exp to xpo so > as to allow the potential use of the name exp for a future extension that > might define an expiration parameter for keys. (The exp name is already > used for this purpose in the JWT specification.) > > > > "n" and "e" would be better than "mod" and "xpo". > > "n" and "e" are very widely used for the RSA modulus and public exponent. > > > > s^e = m mod n > > > > -- > > James Manger > > _______________________________________________ > > jose mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose > > _______________________________________________ > jose mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose > _______________________________________________ > jose mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose >
_______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
