I agree with that's there. One thing we discussed is missing, however. I
would request that this be added to the minutes:
Mike asked why issue #6 (Unclear requirements levels on fields) has not been
closed as fixed. He pointed out that text to resolve this issue was included
in the -09 drafts, which were quite some time ago, and no one has asserted that
those text changes were insufficient or incorrect. Jim said that Richard
Barnes had agreed to produce a table of fields to include as supplemental text
for this issue at the Denver interim meeting but had not yet done so.
-- Mike
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jim
Schaad
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2013 12:34 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [jose] FW: Minutes Posted
And I meant to include the pointer as well.
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/interim/2013/06/17/jose/minutes/minutes-interim-2013-jose-2
From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jim Schaad
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2013 12:20 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [jose] Minutes Posted
The minutes from yesterday's teleconference have been posted.
Please review the content if you were on the call for correctness.
Please review the content if you were not on the call to see what we talked
about and plan to do.
Jim
_______________________________________________
jose mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
