FYI - this was done in the -12 drafts.
-- Mike
From: Mike Jones [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 8:58 AM
To: Matt Miller (mamille2); Richard Barnes
Cc: Jim Schaad; [email protected];
[email protected]
Subject: RE: [jose] Keys in the documents
Will do.
________________________________
From: Matt Miller (mamille2)
Sent: 6/21/2013 6:06 AM
To: Richard Barnes
Cc: Jim Schaad;
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>;
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [jose] Keys in the documents
+1
On Jun 20, 2013, at 8:48 PM, Richard Barnes <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Thursday, June 20, 2013, Jim Schaad wrote:
>
>> Is there any reason not to provide the public and private keys in the
>> appendixes as JWK objects? This would make them easier to understand and
>> put them into a format that one expects to be understood by JOSE systems.*
>> ***
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Jim****
>>
>> ** **
>>
- m&m
Matt Miller < [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> >
Cisco Systems, Inc.
_______________________________________________
jose mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
