To see what I mean, latest test results are here:
<http://pastebin.com/k2pfj34T>


On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Richard Barnes <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Stephen Farrell <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 08/16/2013 03:12 AM, Richard Barnes wrote:
>> > If you tried to do something similar with CMS or IKE, I think the
>> > combinatorics would be similar.  The TLS cipher suite registry is of
>> > comparable size,
>>
>> So I need to go read the jose drafts again I guess but
>> if anything like 300 of anything are MTI then I reckon
>> that's a fail. (I also think the TLS ciphersuite registry
>> is an example of an IETF fail btw, maybe one that we
>> can improve on with TLS1.3 though hopefully;-)
>>
>> S.
>>
>
> There aren't 300 separate things you need to implement.  There are 12 for
> JWS and 22 (16 + 6) for JWE.  And not all of those are MTI.
>
> The big scary numbers just come from trying out the combinations.
>
>
_______________________________________________
jose mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose

Reply via email to