On Jan 9, 2015, at 11:52 PM, Mike Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > If you think that the current notation is unclear, we should sort out how to > clarify it. The best I’ve come up with is to add the phrase “, where STRING > is a sequence of zero or more Unicode characters” to these definitions. (The > language “sequence of zero or more Unicode characters” comes from the > introduction to RFC 7159.) Do you think that would address your questions, > or do you have an alternate suggestion?
You could add a note that says something like this: The specific encoding, ASCII(string) or UTF8(string) specifies how string is encoded as a sequence of octets. The original encoding of string is unspecified, although the specific encoding does also constrain the set of characters that can appear in string. > Sorry again for you not receiving a reply to this until now! I thought you had, but it's no problem either way. Thanks for checking back on it! _______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
