> As a matter of process, this would have been a good objection to bring up at 
> milestone / doc adoption time, since if we're just doing h(spki), there's no 
> need for a document.

Actually, the point of the draft would be to define and register the header 
parameter names used to hold the value for each particular hash function used.

> --Richard

                                                            -- Mike
_______________________________________________
jose mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose

Reply via email to