I'm thinking of the following 3 times alter reading draft 01.
1. "jkt" seems to be used to identify a Jwk.
So this can replace "kid", can't?
2. It should be mentioned if a "jkt" is specified
in a protected header or an unprotected header
for the "JSON Serialization" in JWS/JWE.
3. (This has been discussed while I'm sleeping)
JSON canonicalization should be stated more clearly.
For example, because Python "json.dumps(obj)" fills single whitespace
just after separators(",", ":") by default,
the "separators" parameter must be specified to override this.
Regards,
---
hideki
2015-01-23 10:56 GMT+09:00 Jim Schaad <[email protected]>:
> This starts a two week last call on draft-ietf-jose-jwk-thumbprint. Last
> call will end on February 2, 2015.
>
>
>
> Due to the general lack of activity on the list. General silence will be
> considered as a vote to park the document and either have it done via the
> ISE or with an AD shepherd rather than having group consensus.
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jose mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
>
>
_______________________________________________
jose mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
