Thanks Jim, I will talk with Mike to come up with some plausible solutions.
Best, Nat 2015-02-03 13:56 GMT+09:00 Jim Schaad <[email protected]>: > 1. Please review the email from James Manger on 4/14/14. It is not clear > to me that all of the issues he raised were addressed as there was no > response to the message. Particularly the questions of uniqueness for > black listing of keys. > > 2. There seems to be consensus to not define the new header parameter for > the time being. > > 3. There does not seem to be consensus at this time for what the method of > serialization should be at this time. The current method is deemed overly > complicated by a number of people, but nobody has proposed a method that > people can accept as being future proof in the event that a key defines a > structured field for a key parameter. > > A new draft can easily address the first two issues. I am not sure what > procedure to follow to address the last one. > > Jim > > > _______________________________________________ > jose mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose > -- Nat Sakimura (=nat) Chairman, OpenID Foundation http://nat.sakimura.org/ @_nat_en
_______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
