Thanks for the review, Sarah. Could you send us a link to the review comments
in the tools? (I poked around, including at
https://svn.tools.ietf.org/area/ops/trac/wiki/Directorates, and couldn't find
the review comments.)
Thanks,
-- Mike
-----Original Message-----
From: Sarah Banks [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2015 11:36 AM
To: [email protected]; <[email protected]>
Subject: Opsdir review of draft-ietf-jose-jwk-thumbprint-05
I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These
comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of
the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included
in AD reviews during the IESG review. Document editors and WG chairs should
treat these comments just like any other last call comments.
Document reviewed: draft-ietf-jose-jwk-thumbprint-05
Summary: Ready to go, no nits, 5 comments (see tools).
Overall, if I were implementing this in code, I'd appreciate the preamble,
thanks for the clear description. I also appreciate that the security section
was well considered and discussed. I have no major comments, other than that it
read like .. an algorithm to me, and I was a bit surprised to see it on the
Standards track, rather than informational, but that's just a comment, not a
nit or problem. The draft is ready to go.
Thanks
Sarah
_______________________________________________
jose mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
