+1 --- hideki 2015-07-13 2:32 GMT+09:00 Nat Sakimura <[email protected]>:
> Sorry to chime in so late. I have been completely under water for sometime > now. > > Like Phil, I do see that draft-jones-jose-jws-signing-input-options sort > of thing can be very useful, though I may want to have slightly different > way of encoding the things. Being able to do detached signature is quite > attractive. > > Best, > > Nat > > 2015-07-10 2:37 GMT+09:00 Kathleen Moriarty < > [email protected]>: > >> Hi, >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Jul 9, 2015, at 1:16 PM, Mike Jones <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> About >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jones-jose-jws-signing-input-options-00, >> I’ll add that this addresses the requests make by Jim Schaad and Richard >> Barnes in JOSE Issues #26 “Allow for signature payload to not be base64 >> encoded” and #23 http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/trac/ticket/23 “Make >> crypto independent of binary encoding (base64)”. >> >> >> >> About >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jones-jose-key-managed-json-web-signature-01, >> I’ll add that this addresses the request made by Jim Schaad in JOSE Issue >> #2 http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/trac/ticket/2 “No key management >> for MAC”. >> >> >> >> Also, there’s a highly relevant discussion about key management for MACs >> going on in the COSE working group. See the thread “[Cose] Key >> management for MACs (was Re: Review of draft-schaad-cose-msg-01)” – >> especially >> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cose/aUehU6O7Ui8CXcGxy3TquZOxWH4 >> and >> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cose/ouOIdAOe2P-W8BjGLJ7BNvvRr10. >> >> >> >> One could take the view that our decision on the JOSE key management >> draft should be informed by the related decision in COSE. Specifically, >> that if COSE decides to support key management for MACs, the same reasoning >> likely should apply to our decision on whether to define a standard >> mechanism for supporting key management for MACs in JOSE. >> >> >> >> Key management is explicitly out-of-scope for COSE as stated in the >> charter. The discussion referenced had this point at the close of that >> discussion. >> >> I'm not seeing much support for these drafts moving forward in JOSE. I'm >> also not seeing enough to justify standards track and AD sponsored. If you >> think these are important to have move forward in the WG or as standards >> track, please say so soon. They can still go forward through the >> Independent submission process through the ISE. >> >> Thank you, >> Kathleen >> >> -- Mike >> >> >> >> *From:* jose [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On >> Behalf Of *Karen O'Donoghue >> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 01, 2015 8:38 AM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* [jose] way forward for two remaining drafts >> >> >> >> Folks, >> >> >> >> With the thumbprint draft progressing through the process, we have two >> remaining individual drafts to decide what to do with. The options include: >> 1) adopt as working group drafts; 2) ask for AD sponsorship of individual >> drafts; or 3) recommend that they not be published. Please express your >> thoughts on what we should do with these drafts. Jim, Kathleen, and I would >> like to make a decision in the Prague timeframe, so please respond by 15 >> July. >> >> >> >> >> https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-jones-jose-jws-signing-input-options-00.txt >> >> >> >> >> https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-jones-jose-key-managed-json-web-signature-01.txt >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Karen >> >> _______________________________________________ >> jose mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> jose mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose >> >> > > > -- > Nat Sakimura (=nat) > Chairman, OpenID Foundation > http://nat.sakimura.org/ > @_nat_en > > _______________________________________________ > jose mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose > >
_______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
