On 2015-08-10 23:00, Jim Schaad wrote:
I am just not interested in this I guess.
Yes, the JOSE WG have more or less unanimously decided to ignore the needs of the financial community who wants to sign JSON objects [1] rather than signing arbitrary data using JSON-based signature containers. Anders 1] Although entirely different with respect to JSON normalization, the following independently developed schemes proposals seem to support this statement: https://web-payments.org/specs/source/vocabs/security.html#GraphSignature2012 https://cyberphone.github.io/openkeystore/resources/docs/jcs.html#Sample_Signature _______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
