Thanks for the review, Jim. I've addressed 1-3 in my editor's copy, which I'll
publish by the end of the week. (I'm waiting little bit of time for additional
WGLC comments to come in first.)
I re-verified the examples this afternoon, but would welcome independent
verification. Maybe Matt or Brian or Vladimir???
I am aware of no IPR that is pertinent to this specification.
-- Mike
-----Original Message-----
From: jose [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jim Schaad
Sent: Saturday, September 19, 2015 1:19 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: [jose] draft-ietf-jose-jws-signing-input-options
Chair Review of the document:
Nits Reviews:
1) The abstract should say that it updates RFC7519.
2) The following references are not being used: RFC2104, RFC3447, SHS
3) Make the change control for the registration "IESG" rather than "IETF"
4) Have the examples been verified or have you arranged to have them verified?
5) Please verify that either all known IPR has been reported or there is no
IPR on the document known to the author.
Jim
_______________________________________________
jose mailing list
[email protected]
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3a%2f%2fwww.ietf.org%2fmailman%2flistinfo%2fjose&data=01%7c01%7cmichael.jones%40microsoft.com%7cb350b712092e4a04891508d2c12ffcbc%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=0olZHH7ntUjmyJhqwMkQhEjgNc9E4uq5xpdxUdW%2bL98%3d
_______________________________________________
jose mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
