Shouldn't draft-ietf-jose-jws-signing-input-options update RFC 7515 "JWS"? That seems quite important as draft-ietf-jose-jws-signing-input-options changes the meaning of valid JWS messages (new "b64" field that cannot be ignored, but is not listed in "crit"), and allows a bunch of previously invalid chars in JWS Compact Serializations (invalidating the JWS definition of Compact Serialization as a "URL-safe string").
-- James Manger From: jose [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mike Jones Sent: Wednesday, 14 October 2015 10:49 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [jose] JWS Unencoded Payload Option spec addressing WGLC comments Draft -03 of the JWS Unencoded Payload Option specification addresses the working group last call comments received. Thanks to Jim Schaad, Vladimir Dzhuvinov, John Bradley, and Nat Sakimura for the useful comments. Changes were: * Allowed the ASCII space character and all printable ASCII characters other than period ('.') in non-detached unencoded payloads using the JWS Compact Serialization. * Updated the abstract to say that that the spec updates RFC 7519. * Removed unused references. * Changed the change controller to IESG. The specification is available at: * https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-jose-jws-signing-input-options-03 An HTML formatted version is also available at: * http://self-issued.info/docs/draft-ietf-jose-jws-signing-input-options-03.html -- Mike P.S. This note was also published at http://self-issued.info/?p=1465 and as @selfissued<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3a%2f%2ftwitter.com%2fselfissued&data=01%7c01%7cmichael.jones%40microsoft.com%7c3a69db7b8b6c4d47da0f08d2937a3d82%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=ggurSMkRVW%2bR8Nv93Mnbsf16CmVGqfjB9lW8SV5gAKM%3d>.
_______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
