I'm Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 10, 2015, at 4:15 PM, Ilari Liusvaara <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 01:01:29PM -0500, Kathleen Moriarty wrote: >> Hi, >> >> There is a thread on the SAAG list about possibly handling drafts like >> this in a new WG: >> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/search/?email_list=saag >> >> That's an option too. > > I thought that WG would be only for protocols without primary WG (or > primary WG that still formally exists, but is unwinding and thus won't > take any new work). And for protocols with active WG (e.g. TLS) it > would go to the primary protocol WG. > > I don't know how JOSE relates to that. Perhaps it is soon going to > start unwinding? Or has it already? The WG could decide to take this on or another option would be to work on it in the new WG for this purpose. There is just one draft left in this group at the moment that is close to publication, so the chairs and WG can figure out what you collectively think is best. Thanks, Kathleen > > >> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Ilari Liusvaara >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I cooked up a pre-draft (already circulated privately) about using CFRG >>> ECC work in JOSE. Encompasses both ECDH and signatures. > > > -Ilari _______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
