Regarding section 4 of the proposed -01 spec: When dealing with "oct" JWKs, shouldn't the PKCS#11 URI type parameter become "secret-key"?
Vladimir On 05/07/17 21:01, Nathaniel McCallum wrote: > I have updated the draft from the comments everyone has provided. > However, document uploads are currently locked due to the IETF > meeting, so I have attached the document here. Your feedback is > greatly appreciated. > > On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 5:33 PM, Nathaniel McCallum > <[email protected]> wrote: >> I have prepared an initial stab at a draft for offloading JWK private >> key data to PKCS #11. >> >> You can find the document here: >> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mccallum-jose-pkcs11-jwk-00.txt >> >> Thanks for your consideration!
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
