I think quite a few people might benefit from JSON c14n, but the water was poisoned by the hideous XML experience and there's a general reluctance to go anywhere near it. If we saw a really plausible proposal, we could possibly think about rehydrating the JSON WG to look at it.
On Thu., Oct. 11, 2018, 1:45 p.m. Carsten Bormann, <[email protected]> wrote: > On Oct 11, 2018, at 21:58, Anders Rundgren <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > shroud their precious JSON data in Base64Url > > I know how to fix this, but that’s a different WG :-) > > Grüße, Carsten > > _______________________________________________ > jose mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose >
_______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
