As I wrote the issue here is how to deal with ISE documents, now, and in the
future. JWS/CT is a recent example highlighting a problem that the IETF may
need to address.
Forcing authors to decorate their documents with plenty of "red flags",
including in the abstract, is one possibility, albeit not particularly attractive.
Another solution is scrapping the ISE concept altogether.
thanx,
Anders
On 2021-12-12 14:31, Carsten Bormann wrote:
On 2021-12-12, at 08:41, Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren....@gmail.com> wrote:
*] This informational specification has been produced outside the IETF,
is not an IETF standard, and does not have IETF consensus.
This is a true statement, so I don’t know how you could be opposed.
What is still not true is the “clear text” in the title.
I thought we had discussed this; I’m certainly not going to engage in any
repeat discussion.
Keeping this term in the title smacks like intent to deceive.
Grüße, Carsten
_______________________________________________
jose mailing list
jose@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
