Hi! To add to Karen's summary, thank you to the co-chairs, presenters and BoF participants for starting this conversation around JWP.
The video recording [1] and notes [2] capture the full details of the meeting. Key highlights I noted were: (a) The proponents of the work said that JWP: -- required a new JOSE representation -- was intended to satisfy unlinkability and support selective disclosure -- would be used by W3C VC (b) The community asked questions around: -- (if JOSE were re-opened) would additional JOSE work be welcome (beyond JWP) -- why the existing JOSE representations are insufficient -- the design approach for realizing the security properties -- links to prior work on disclosure in OAuth -- links to the W3C work (c) The community proposed: -- exploring links with PrivacyPass As stated at the close of the meeting and in Karen's summary below, more discussion is needed. The proponents have asked for a virtual interim BOF before IETF 115 in November. This request has been approved by the IESG. Please watch this list for further details. I would expect the agenda to cover many of the items noted in (b) and (c). Regards, Roman [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cWS7ud6Br2Q [2] https://notes.ietf.org/notes-ietf-114-jwp# On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 6:51 PM Karen O'Donoghue <[email protected]> wrote: > The JWP BoF was held on Monday. Thank you to the proponents who provided > all the presentations and drafts for the BoF. The BoF ran out of time > before reaching any conclusions. In hindsight, we should have scheduled two > hours. At this stage we have been asked to continue discussion of the > questions raised on the jose mailing list and schedule a virtual interim > BoF. This will need to be approved by the IESG, and a key here will be > demonstrating some progress on the questions raised on the mailing list. > > > > The draft minutes are available: > > https://notes.ietf.org/notes-ietf-114-jwp# > > Please review the minutes and provide any updates by next Friday 5 August. > > > > For additional information, the original BoF request is here: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bofreq-miller-json-web-proofs/ > > And the drafts and slides from the BoF are linked from the IETF 114 > agenda. > > > > Thanks, > > Karen > > _______________________________________________ > jose mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose > _______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
