On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 08:07:02AM -0500, Orie Steele wrote: > Responses inline: > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 8:01 AM Richard Barnes <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On the specific question of encoding the encapsulated keys -- It would be > > a mistake to encode these as keys. The HPKE spec deliberately treats these > > as opaque byte strings to preserve agility with regard to the KEM. > > > > So no registry updates needed?
Right. > > > In DHKEM, the encapsulated value is a serialized public key, but that is > > not true more generally. > > > > Registry updates would be needed to support new suites (kyber, etc) Only the HPKE KEM registry needs to be updated. Which is Not Our Problem. -Ilari _______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
