This looks good to me. Thanks, Roman.
-- Mike
-----Original Message-----
From: jose <[email protected]> On Behalf Of The IESG
Sent: Tuesday, December 5, 2023 3:03 PM
To: IETF-Announce <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: [jose] WG Review: Javascript Object Signing and Encryption (jose)
The Javascript Object Signing and Encryption (jose) WG in the Security Area of
the IETF is undergoing rechartering. The IESG has not made any determination
yet. The following draft charter was submitted, and is provided for
informational purposes only. Please send your comments to the IESG mailing list
([email protected]) by 2023-12-12.
Javascript Object Signing and Encryption (jose)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Current status: Active WG
Chairs:
John Bradley <[email protected]>
John Preuß Mattsson <[email protected]>
Karen O'Donoghue <[email protected]>
Assigned Area Director:
Roman Danyliw <[email protected]>
Security Area Directors:
Roman Danyliw <[email protected]>
Paul Wouters <[email protected]>
Mailing list:
Address: [email protected]
To subscribe: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
Archive: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jose/
Group page: https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/jose/
Charter: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-jose/
The original [JSON Object Signing and Encryption (JOSE) working group][1]
standardized JSON-based representations for: Integrity-protected objects (JSON
Web Signatures/JWS, RFC 7515), Encrypted objects (JSON Web Encryption/JWE,
RFC7516), Key representations (JSON Web Key/JWK, RFC 7517), Algorithm
definitions (JSON Web Algorithms/JWA, RFC 7518), and Test vectors for the above
(Examples of Protecting Content Using JSON Object Signing and Encryption, RFC
7520).
These were used to define the JSON Web Token (JWT) (RFC 7519), which in turn,
has seen widespread deployment in areas as diverse as [digital identity][2] and
[secure telephony][3].
As adoption of these standards to express and communicate sensitive data has
grown, so too has an increasing societal focus on privacy. User consent,
minimal disclosure, and unlinkability are common privacy themes in identity
solutions.
A multi-decade research activity for a sizeable academic and applied
cryptography community has focused on these privacy and knowledge mechanisms
(often referred to as anonymous credentials). Certain cryptographic techniques
developed in this space involve pairing-friendly curves and zero-knowledge
proofs (ZKPs) (to name just a few). Some of the benefits of ZKP algorithms
include unlinkability, selective disclosure, and the ability to use predicate
proofs.
The current container formats defined by JOSE and JWT are not able to represent
data using ZKP algorithms. Among the reasons are that most require an
additional transform or finalize step, many are designed to operate on sets and
not single messages, and the interface to ZKP algorithms has more inputs than
conventional signing algorithms. The reconstituted JOSE working group will
address these new needs, while reusing aspects of JOSE and JWT, where
applicable.
This group is chartered to work on the following goals:
- An Informational document detailing Use Cases and Requirements for new
specifications enabling JSON-based selective disclosure and zero-knowledge
proofs.
- Standards Track document(s) specifying representation(s) of
independently-disclosable integrity-protected sets of data and/or proofs using
JSON-based data structures, which also aims to prevent the ability to correlate
by different verifiers.
- Standards Track document(s) specifying representation(s) of JSON-based claims
and/or proofs enabling selective disclosure of these claims and/or proofs, and
that also aims to prevent the ability to correlate by different verifiers.
- Standards Track document(s) specifying how to use existing cryptographic
algorithms and defining their algorithm identifiers. The working group will
not invent new cryptographic algorithms.
- Standards Track document(s) specifying how to represent keys for these new
algorithms as JSON Web Keys (JWKs).
- Informational document(s) defining test vectors for these new specifications.
- Standards Track document(s) defining CBOR-based representations corresponding
to all the above, building upon the COSE and CWT specifications in the same way
that the above build on JOSE and JWT.
One or more of these goals may be combined into a single document, in which
case the concrete milestones for these goals will be satisfied by the
consolidated document(s).
The JOSE working group will also maintain the JOSE standard and facilitate
discussion of clarifications, improvements, and extensions to JWS, JWE, JWA,
and JWK. The WG will evaluate, and potentially adopt, proposed standard
documents dealing with algorithms that would fit the criteria of being IETF
consensus algorithms. Potential candidates would include those algorithms that
have been evaluated by the CFRG and algorithms which have gone through a public
review and evaluation process such as was done for the NIST SHA-3 algorithms.
Potential candidates would not include national-standards-based algorithms that
have not gone through a similar public review process. The WG may also publish
informational and BCP documents describing the proper use of these algorithms
in JOSE.
An informal goal of the working group is close coordination with the
[rechartered W3C Verifiable Credentials WG][4], which has taken a dependency on
this work for the second version of its Verifiable Credentials specification.
The working group will also coordinate with the [Selective Disclosure JWT][5]
work in the [OAuth][6] working group, the [Privacy Pass][7] working group, the
[CBOR][8] working group, the [COSE][10] working group, and the [CFRG][9].
[1]: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-jose/02/
[2]: https://openid.net/connect/
[3]: https://www.ietf.org/blog/stir-action/
[4]: https://www.w3.org/2022/05/proposed-vc-wg-charter.html
[5]:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-selective-disclosure-jwt/
[6]: https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/oauth/about/ [7]:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/privacypass/about/ [8]:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/cbor/about/ [9]:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/rg/cfrg/about/ [10]:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/cose/about/
Milestones:
Jan 2024 - Adopt document registering cryptographic algorithm identifiers
that fully specify the cryptographic operations to be performed (as
proposed standard)
Apr 2024 - Adopt document describing the use of the NIST algorithm ML-KEM
in JOSE (as proposed standard)
Apr 2024 - Adopt document describing the use of the NIST algorithm ML-DSA
in JOSE (as proposed standard)
Apr 2024 - Adopt document describing the use of the NIST algorithm SLH-DSA
in JOSE (as proposed standard)
Apr 2024 - Adopt document describing the use of the NIST algorithm NL-DSA
in JOSE (as proposed standard)
_______________________________________________
jose mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
_______________________________________________
jose mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
