This seems like a good thing for the JOSE working group to work on. I'm consistently amazed that we haven't come up with a way to avoid all this duplicate work between JOSE and COSE, but given we're in the state we're in, we might as well do the work to maintain parity. --Richard
On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 12:56 AM Michael Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > Speaking both as an editor of this document as a COSE co-chair, I think > it’s important to adopt this document so that it can progress in parallel > with https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cose-hpke/. They have > already been informing content and decisions between the two of them. It’s > my goal wearing both hats to keep them as aligned as possible (and as > simple as possible). > > > > Thanks all, > > -- Mike > > > > *From:* Karen ODonoghue <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Thursday, May 23, 2024 12:42 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [jose] Call for Adoption for draft-rha-jose-hpke-encrypt > > > > JOSE working group, > > > > The following individual submission: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rha-jose-hpke-encrypt/ > > has received a fair amount of comment and discussion. > > > > This email starts a two week call for adoption. Please review the > document, provide feedback, and indicate whether you think this is a > document for the working group to pursue. Please reply by 5 June keeping > the subject line intact. In addition to any feedback, please be clear about > your position on adoption. > > > > Regards, > > JOSE working group chairs. > _______________________________________________ > jose mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ jose mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
