Thanks for your view, Bret. What is your use case? Specifically, is there
something you plan to represent as a JWP that you can’t using the Compact
Serialization? If so, what?
Our motivation is to have a single JSON serialization, like JWT does, to
increase interoperability.
Thanks,
-- Mike
From: Bret Jordan <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 6, 2024 5:14 PM
To: Michael Jones <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [jose] Do you need the JWP JSON Serialization?
Yes, to JSON serialization.
Thanks
Bret
On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 5:42 PM Michael Jones
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I’m writing to ask whether any of you have a use case that requires the JSON
Web Proof JSON Serialization? Unless concrete reasons are provided to keep it,
we propose to make the Compact Serialization the only JSON Serialization for
JWPs. This is being tracked at
https://github.com/ietf-wg-jose/json-web-proof/issues/100.
Responses saying “I don’t need the JSON Serialization” are also welcomed.
(A CBOR serialization is planned of course – something we hope to create before
IETF 121 in Dublin, building on the work to use binary fields values in
computations that we did prior to Vancouver.)
Thanks,
-- Mike & DW
_______________________________________________
jose mailing list -- [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
jose mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
