On Fri, 10 Oct 2025 at 19:39, Simo Sorce <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, 2025-10-10 at 11:49 +0530, tirumal reddy wrote: > > > > The decision that it is for interoperability is already discussed and > finalized in Section 4 of draft-ietf-cose-dilithium. This document aligns > with that decision > > There is no need to repeat a controversial statement (that adds nothing > to the decision made in the document) just because they are present in > another IETF document. The COSE draft should drop that incorrect > statement as well IMO. >
I disagree. Reiterating this point here ensures consistency and helps understand the alignment across related documents. draft-ietf-cose-dilithium is already in the RFC editor queue and this issue was discussed in the COSE WG, see https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cose/gF4yEG8ps03nvgvPHALiMkYwg68/ . -Tiru > > -- > Simo Sorce > Distinguished Engineer > RHEL Crypto Team > Red Hat, Inc > >
_______________________________________________ jose mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
