Dirk Stöcker wrote: > On Mon, 7 Dec 2009, Frederik Ramm wrote: > >> interesting post by Matt on this blog: >> >> http://www.asklater.com/matt/wordpress/2009/12/editor-retention/ >> >> He arrives at the result that JOSM users are the ones most likely to >> stay with their editor. (Well... what else is available?) > > : JOSM, somewhat surprisingly, has more changesets total and with bboxes, > : but maybe that’s just because until recently every upload was it’s own > : changeset. > > Actually I'm not surprised. I think most power users will use JOSM, so > more changesets are the result. Would be interesting to get the rate of > changed elements per changeset for each editor. That would distinguish > power users from minor edits. > > Also nice would be the "created_by" count in OSM data. Due to silently > dropping them, JOSM's usage is also easy to see :-)
created_by= tags get stomped by Potlatch, JOSM leaves it alone if it's already set (unless, of course, a JOSM user deliberately deletes the existing created_by tags). This would give severely skewed results in favor of Potlatch. _______________________________________________ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev