ELI has a privacy url field, though I believe Vespucci is currently the only editor that a) points this out, and b) makes the link accessible to end users.
Simon Am 14.02.2020 um 18:46 schrieb Greg Troxel: > Frederik Ramm <frede...@remote.org> writes: > >> I can understand that if I load Ilya's geochat plugin it will phone home >> to Ilya's server, or if I enable certain imagery layers they will load >> data from the imagery server. Also it is clear that JOSM will access the >> OSM and JOSM servers. But I think that we should not add random third >> party web sites that are under control of neither OSMF nor the JOSM team >> to the mix without explaining this to the user and asking for their consent. > Agreed that this is the right expectations. > > There's an interesting issue with third-party imagery and map layers, > which is how users know their privacy policies, such as what records > they keep of which IP addresses looked at which areas, and if this is > diclosed, etc. It would be good to have a standardized access point for > these (that one can discover from a tile URL), and to have these links > assocatied with the tile layer definition. > > The next step would be some standard semantics or simply human > evaluation of whether the tile provider commits to nondisclosure, > non-use and/or non-retention. >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature