Hmm - doing .before(HTML).remove() won't be enough (since that only
helps with the #id case, not any others). Could you file a bug on
this?
http://dev.jquery.com/
--John
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 6:52 AM, machac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hallo,
>
> in jQuery 1.2.6 is replaceWith(HTML) method is defined as
> after(HTML).remove()
>
> It's correct but if in inserted HTML is JS code witch refer some
> element ID from inserted HTML then JS may be evaluated on element with
> same ID in removed code and not on inserted.
>
> Example
>
> 1) original HTML
> ...
> <div id="testId">
> <span id="subId"></span>
> <script>
> $(document).ready(function() {
> $('#subId').append('Some HTML');
> }
> </script>
> </div>
> ...
>
> 2) in AJAX callback load new version of 'tesId' element (with other
> content) from server
>
> newVersion =
> <div id="testId">
> <span id="subId"></span>
> some text
> <script>
> $(document).ready(function() {
> $('#subId').append('Some HTML');
> }
> </script>
> </div>
>
> and then call raplace it
>
> $('#testId').replaceWith(newVersion);
>
> 3) in result the JS code is evaluated on original element because is
> called
>
> after() with result
>
> <div id="testId"> -- original
> <span id="subId"></span>
> <script>
> $(document).ready(function() {
> $('#subId').append('Some HTML');
> }
> </script>
> </div>
> <div id="testId"> -- new version
> <span id="subId"></span>
> some text
> <script>
> $(document).ready(function() { -- new evaluated script
> $('#subId').append('Some HTML');
> }
> </script>
> </div>
>
> then evaluated new version JS part which find and evaluate on first
> (original) 'subId' element and calling remove() remove whole original
> element.
>
>
> What about prefer "before(HTML).remove()" implementation which is
> equivalent and works fine in this type of use. Looking at
> implemenetation of before/after methods:
>
> before: this.parentNode.insertBefore( elem, this );
> after: this.parentNode.insertBefore( elem, this.nextSibling );
>
> 'after has 1 operation more -> 'before' can be bit faster.
>
> I don't know how is implemented DOM trees in browsers. If list of sub
> elements is like:
>
> 1) linked list - no penalty of inserting element to any place (in may
> opinion is this right)
> 2) array list - bit slower inserting item on -1 place
>
> Is this right request for enhancement in next jQuery releases?
>
> In our project we will use before(HTML).remove() since :-(.
>
> Thank's for such great library
> Zdenek
>
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"jQuery Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
