for the test case, maybe is good to pass in different datatype in $.ajaxSetup();
e.g.
$.ajaxSetup({ a : null, b:123, c:new Object(), d:"this is a test",
f:this, g:true, .... etc}
~ sglai
2008/9/22 Ariel Flesler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Can you provide a test case ? thanks.
>
> --
> Ariel Flesler
> http://flesler.blogspot.com/
>
> On Sep 21, 11:26 am, "sui-sing Lai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> ok, I tried to pass "this" object to ajax callback.
>> I refer to jQuery doc and find out that I can pass it to via
>> $.ajaxSetup( { mydata : this } ).
>> code go like this:
>>
>> var myObj = function() {
>> $.ajaxSetup({mydata:this});
>> $.ajax({
>> ....
>> success:function(xml){ this.mydata.status = 200}
>> }
>>
>> }
>>
>> Hope this is better.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> sglai
>>
>> 2008/9/21 Jörn Zaefferer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>> > Could you be more specific about the actual issue?
>> > $.ajaxSetup({mydata:this}) doesn't make much sense.
>>
>> > Jörn
>>
>> > On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 10:58 AM, sglai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> >> Hi,
>>
>> >> Happen to find this problem. Does release test case cover this?
>>
>> >> Regards,
>> >> sglai
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"jQuery Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
