I have two recent asp.net integration scenarios. I used to work with classic asp and the library so i was able to ignore many concepts that my coleagues has, they are core asp.net developers.
The first project was a product control system. We integrated jQuery, ajax.net and telerik lib. The project is currently on production status and its working fine. Things were kinda turbulent since we missused many web concepts and got lost on postbacks trying to fake ajax but i assign that problem mainly to the rest of the team inexperience with rich web programming. On that project ajax.net and telerik proved to be completaly unnecessary for using jQuery so i decided to mount the next one totaly on jQuery The project im working currently is the website which inherits info from the product control. All the javascript on the website is using jquery and my coleagues have some complains on how they cant debug the code, even though i stressed enough about using firebug. I hope when they ship jquery with visual studio they add some features for that on the debugger. But that is not a problem since i'm in charge of creating, reviewing and improving javascript in general on the project. Everything is working fine and development is going really fast with a really low bug rate. On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 10:07 AM, Brandon Aaron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Would you mind creating an enhancement ticket for this, so it doesn't get > lost? And please share anymore of your experiences like this of integrating > .Net with jQuery! http://dev.jquery.com/newticket/ > -- > Brandon Aaron > > > On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 1:44 AM, Travis Simon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> Yes, I have managed to get it to work reasonably well for my purposes. >> My suggestion is just that - a suggestion for the JQuery community. >> Apparently Microsoft will be shipping JQuery in its next release >> of .Net, and little issues like this will make the experience easier >> for those users, and will hopefully make life easier for the JQuery >> community as well (that is, there are whiners in every community, and >> removing a few of the stumbling blocks should prevent some 'Microsoft >> Ajax is so much better' type posts. >> >> Again, thanks to all. >> >> On Oct 9, 1:03 pm, "Thiago Cruz Santos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> > just use "classic" programming on asp.net, post normaly using jquery >> then >> > analyse on the code behind if the stuff you posted got there and then >> fire >> > your method. if you need a return just write it and end the response. >> works >> > dandy on the project i am >> > >> > On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 7:32 PM, Travis Simon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> > > Hello all, >> > >> > > I'm exploring JQuery with .Net (and loving it!), but I have hit a >> > > small snag (that I was able to patch locally). >> > >> > > .Net has a convenient method for creating webservices in the same code >> > > file that the page's logic - known as the code-behind. This is the >> > > standard method for using AJAX with Microsoft Ajax. However, these >> > > methods expect their parameters to be passed as JSON encoded strings, >> > > as opposed to query strings. Would it be possible to add this as a >> > > encoding option to the .ajax method? >> > >> > > In my case, I'm going via (the wondeful) jqGrid control, so I can't >> > > perform the encoding myself before passing it to the .ajax call. >> > > However, if it were an option were available, I'm sure jqGrid and >> > > other controls would expose that property. >> > >> > > For my purposes, I'm using the .toJSON method located here: >> > >http://code.google.com/p/jquery-json/ >> > >> > > Thanks and keep up the great work, >> > > Travis >> >> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" group. To post to this group, send email to jquery-dev@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
