I think it's ok. Will add it asap. Thanks both!
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 12:37 PM, Andrea Giammarchi < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The patch seems to be faster than Object.prototype.toString.call(fn) === > "[object Function]", dunno about side effects with extra weird cases. > > > > > On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 4:16 PM, Choan Gálvez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > >> >> Hi. >> >> On Oct 16, 2008, at 1:14 AM, Ariel Flesler wrote: >> >> > >> > Can you provide a screenshot that shows the leak warning ? >> >> I attached two screenshosts that show the progression in memory usage >> to the ticket. >> >> Tests are run using Drip, the file is an (almost) empty HTML document >> which points to jquery.js. >> >> >> Best. >> >> >> > On Oct 15, 3:09 pm, Choan Gálvez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Hi all. >> >> >> >> Changeset <http://dev.jquery.com/changeset/5792> introduced a memory >> >> leak on IE6. >> >> >> >> I've created a ticket and proposed a patch, see < >> http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/3485 >> >> >. >> >> >> >> Best. >> >> -- >> >> Choan >> > > >> >> >> >> > > > > -- Ariel Flesler http://flesler.blogspot.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
