I believe Adam is in the beginning stages of developing applications
for the Oracle Portal platform. He has a few portlets that also are
shown as standalone pages (thus why, at least for now, they both have
the jquery script; obviously that's not an ideal solution). We
noticed this behavior and wanted to see what you guys thought.
I assume, also, that's why a lot of developers scope their code with a
closure, and pass in the jQuery object (as has been suggested on the
jQuery blog before)
<script src="jquery.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
(function($)
{
// all of my code here.
})(jQuery.noConflict());
jQuery('#myElement').click(function()
{
// not safe, a reference to jQuery here has no guarantee that it
will be the jQuery I included, correct?
});
</script>
That way, if a bookmarklet was fired and overwrote jQuery, your event
handlers and any code that might execute after the bookmarklet would
still have a reference to the original.
Points well taken, thanks for all the responses.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"jQuery Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
