This may help you hunt down the issue, but one change that was made was that if a time of 0 is passed in to an animation then it happens instantly (no delay, no asynchronous behavior). Thus you'll probably want to take that into account when doing an animation like that.
I have a feeling that if you set the time to be 1 in both demos it would work identically. --John On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 2:09 AM, MarionNewlevant <marion.newlev...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I boiled it down as much as I could. Test case is here: > http://newlevant.com/marion/jqueryplugins/concentrationBug/ > > Calling animate like so: > animate({opacity: 1.0}, flip.time, function () { ... }); > > And if flip.time is 0, subsequent calls don't wait for the animation > to finish before calling the animate callback. > > Have not submitted a bug report (new to the whole system), but will if > you think I should. > > (jQuery is fabulous by the way. Plugin where I found this bug is here: > http://newlevant.com/marion/jqueryplugins/concentration/ ) > > Marion > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" group. To post to this group, send email to jquery-dev@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
