http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/3877
The response ths ticket got isn't what I would have expected it to get based on the reactions in this thread? Wha happen? --adam On Dec 18 2008, 8:11 pm, oliver <[email protected]> wrote: > I suppose this is only changing thereturnvalue of $.each, not $ > ([elem]).each(), correct? It does seem useful to have access to that, > but can't this line above: > $.each(col, cb); > be re-written in a nested function in such a way as to get the access > to thereturnvalue? > $.each(col, function(i, n) { var result = cb.call(this); }); > > oliver > > On Dec 18, 6:03 am, "Ariel Flesler" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Ah... sort of an (inverted) detect/any function.... > > > Ok, why not :) > > > On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 11:58 AM, John Resig <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Isn't that what $.map does ? > > > > Not really. He wants it so that you can do: > > > > var ret = $.each(array, function(){ > > > if ( this == someValue ) > > > returnfalse; > > > }); > > > > if ( ret == false ) { > > > // do something > > > } > > > > thereturnvalue will only equal false if areturnfalse was done to > > > break the loop. > > > > --John > > > -- > > Ariel Fleslerhttp://flesler.blogspot.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
