If you mean another additional method, I could see some merit in that.
If you mean to calculate both the height and width every time you call
height or width, I think that would do more negative impact than good.
On Feb 13, 5:20 pm, Dimi Paun <d...@zipalong.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-02-13 at 17:10 -0500, John Resig wrote:
> > > I think this is important to have: when calling .height()/.width()
> > > we have to show the element to measuring it, and this makes it
> > > twice as slow to get both the height/width. On large elements
> > > this can bring the time down to 500ms from 1s. Big improvement.
>
> > Umm - unless I'm missing something that hasn't changed - in $.size
> > there are the following lines:
>
> > 59 if ( $.curCSS( elem, "display" )!='none' ) getSize();
> > 60 // swap element layout, then calculate value
> > 61 else $.swap( elem, {
> > 62 position: "absolute", visibility: "hidden",
> > display: "block"
> > 63 }, getSize );
>
> No, I just didn't read the code right, I just based it on the name.
>
> So, I think we should have a .size() or .dim() function to
> return both the width()/height() at the same time to work
> around the above problem.
>
> --
> Dimi Paun <d...@zipalong.com>
> Zipalong, Inc.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"jQuery Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to jquery-dev@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
