Hello - Interesting work, congrats!
A couple quick points: Kind of disconcerting that it's actually not being integrated into another library - that's where much of the hard part comes from (and speed degradation). It's also curious because the MooTools team complained when I compared Sizzle to MooTools rather than Sizzle to just the MooTools selector engine. Being able to see those results would be interesting. Finally, the lack of unit tests is really worrying: http://github.com/digitarald/sly/blob/4224ff310ab5ce91b398270f3dbd6d39a7590f5d/Specs/Utilities/Sly.js For example, right now the jQuery test suite includes hundreds of obscure and difficult problems that we need to work around - we took much of our performance hit in getting those right (not to mention, integrating them directly in to another framework). --John On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 10:44 PM, Harald K <m...@digitarald.de> wrote: > > Hi jQuery devs, > > I just released a (probably useful) piece of JavaScript that may > concern your selector interested developers. Performance is > outstanding in all cases, it is only 3kb, framework-agnostic and easy > to implement and to extend. > > Announcement: > http://digitarald.de/journal/89737433/rolling-out-sly-the-javascript-selector-engine/ > > Slickspeed: > http://digitarald/repos/sly/speed/index.php > > Source & Documentation: > http://github.com/digitarald/sly/tree/master > > Any feedback is welcome. > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" group. To post to this group, send email to jquery-dev@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
