Hmm, yeah, I think that's probably a bug, as it stands. Could you file a
ticket?

--John


On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 11:34 PM, Jeffery To <jeffery...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Hi,
>
> Going through the test suite (with jQuery 1.3.2), I noticed that there
> is a selector test for "div div:eq(27)". Trying the query in Firebug
> gave me the test suite's expected result (div#hide), but if I try
> jQuery("div div").eq(27) it returns a different div.
>
> Digging a little deeper, it turns out that when evaluating the :eq()
> selector (and I would assume other positional selectors), duplicates
> are not removed from the working list of elements before evaluating.
> For jQuery("div div").eq(27), duplicates are removed in jQuery("div
> div") before calling .eq(27), which is why it returns a different
> result.
>
> My question is, is this a bug? To me it seems that jQuery("div div:eq
> (27)") and jQuery("div div").eq(27) should return the same result, and
> that jQuery("div div").eq(27) returns the correct result.
>
> If this is more of a Sizzle question, please let me know and I'll post
> it in the Sizzle group.
>
> Thanks,
> Jeff
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"jQuery Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to jquery-dev@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to