Hi, I'm a big fan of JQuery, it's totally changed the way I write Javascript.
One thing it's started to make me do is to use custom events a lot more but something that has struck me is that the event.trigger seems to be somewhat inconsistent with the rest of the api in terms of passing variables around. The specific piece that I'm taking about is the event.data, when you bind things, you can incorporate the data into the call e.g. foo.bind("bar", {foo: bar}); - where foo becomes a property of event.data but when I trigger things I have to do this: foo.trigger("bar", [{foo: bar1}]) and the extra data comes in as a second argument to the event being called. While this is quite useful functionality, I feel it does depart somewhat from the original, I would expect to pass in an object that could extend and overwrite the original event.data object as well as being able to pass in extra arguments, so it might look something more like this: foo.trigger("bar", {foo: bar1}, [{foo2: bar}]; where the 2nd argument ({foo: bar1}) overwrites the original property ({foo: bar}) like jQuery.extend({}, event.data, latestData); I was wondering if there is any specific reason it is done this way & whether there is anywhere I could suggest that it is altered? Thanks Simon --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" group. To post to this group, send email to jquery-dev@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---