Hi Mark, you are welcome, I always post comments unless it is not scam but to be honest, I still do not get it. What I wrote is that behaviors are different, the rest is a caja choice. I agree that you explained what is the caja choice, but I still do not get why there is this choice.
JavaScript is extremely flexible, thanks lord, I always do not get things that try to restrict its duality/flexibility. Btw, does your reply mean that Function does not require new in front of it? If this is the case, I am happy with it, and I can remove it from my personal jQuery file :D Regards On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 10:14 PM, MarkM <[email protected]> wrote: > > On May 20, 2:48 pm, Andrea Giammarchi <[email protected]> > wrote: > > OK, in this case I am sorry and forget my previous comment, I will > > eventaully talk about this with Caja people. > > > Hi Andrea, I have only now noticed your question at > > http://webreflection.blogspot.com/2009/05/google-caja-whats-wrong-with-this.html > Thanks for posting my reply on your blog. > > For anyone here curious about the matter, see my reply on the blog > page of Andrea's. > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
