> I ran it around 15 times and the winner changes radically, both yield > random numbers between 40-80 in Chrome. Non-caching seems to win most of > the time but with the change rate, the numbers don't seem reliable. >
I assume you're talking about Internet Explorer 6? You need to use a copy that has a reliable timer, in order to get reliable timer results. I wrote about this here: http://ejohn.org/blog/accuracy-of-javascript-time/ In this case, running ies4osx yields very stable results - consistently showing IE 6 running over 2x faster. Even when not running that, though, in a normal IE browser in a non-VM environment I get: IE 6 141ms 265ms IE 7 157ms 265ms IE 8 94ms 187ms and I can reload those and get equivalent results quite reliably. --John --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" group. To post to this group, send email to jquery-dev@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
