This seems pointless to me. You can create a new jQ object from 'this'
anytime you want - and only when you want, avoiding the overhead.
Would be useful if $this referred to the whole collection being
iterated, not the current element in the loop.
cheers
ricardo
On Jul 21, 12:14 am, Yehuda Katz <wyc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> At the moment, traversal callbacks, like the ones passed to find/filter/etc.
> take a single "index" parameter. I'd like to propose that they are unified
> with .each as follows:
> $("div").filter(function(i, self) {
> // stuff
>
> });
>
> As a separate concern, I'd like to discuss changing the second parameter in
> both to be a jQuery object. Obviously, it would need to be done via slow
> deprecation for .each, but I don't think it'd break all that much code:
>
> $("div").filter(function(i, self) {
> // self == $(this)
>
> })
>
> Thoughts?
>
> --
> Yehuda Katz
> Developer | Engine Yard
> (ph) 718.877.1325
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"jQuery Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to jquery-dev@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
