I usually encapsulate toString from Object.prototype and if somebody breaks the rule it means we cannot trust anything included typeof. So, in few words, nobody has intersts into break this rule, imho.
On Jul 26, 2009 8:07 AM, "DBJDBJ" <dbj...@gmail.com> wrote: Also, IMHO this yields high level of encapsulation of an important mechanism. Which is a good thing. And it is a fraction of a micro second slower then Object.prototype.toString.call(x) === "[object Object]" but it is more compact ... In any case we are entering the subjective judgement phase, so I think we should stop here and leave it to jQuery team to use this or not... --DBJ On Jul 26, 12:09 am, Andrea Giammarchi <andrea.giammar...@gmail.com> wrote: > I miss the point about regexp usage ... please tell me the difference (in a > real scenario) betwe... > On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 1:38 PM, DBJDBJ <dbj...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > This indeed woks : functi... --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" group. To post to this group, send email to jquery-dev@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
