Actually the ticket about .get(-1) (http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/4188) (opened by me), have changes about eq(-1) too. I was wondering why it was ignored.
On Aug 14, 2:19 pm, John Resig <jere...@gmail.com> wrote: > I don't see why not - we already support .get(-1), .eq(-1) makes sense. Want > to file a feature ticket for it? > > --John > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 2:34 AM, James Padolsey < > > jamespadol...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > Would this be a possibility? > > > It would be nice if it worked like JavaScript's Array methods, whereby > > passing a negative number indicates a position from the end of the > > array. So, with the following collection: > > > [<a/>, <div/>, <span/>] > > > eq(-1) would return <span/>, eq(-2) would return <div/>... > > > This could be added for the .eq() method and the selector-expression > > (:eq(..)). > > > Just an idea... --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" group. To post to this group, send email to jquery-dev@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
