Sorry, maybe this one will be better:
garbage:(function(splice){
return function(){
var length = this.length;
while(length){
if(!contains(this.context, this[--length]))
jQuery.remove.call(splice.call(this, length, 1));
};
return this;
};
})(Array.prototype.splice),
Regards
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Andrea Giammarchi <
andrea.giammar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> What a bout a garbage collector prototype method? Is there any plugin like
> this?
>
> garbage:(function(splice){
> return function(){
> var length = this.length;
> while(length){
> if(!contains(this.context, this[--length]))
> splice.call(this, length, 1);
> };
> return this;
> };
> })(Array.prototype.splice),
>
> The problem is that to use the jQuery contains function it requires to be
> inside the library since if I am not wrong contains is not exposed.
>
> What do you think?
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 4:00 PM, John Resig <jere...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Not really, right? You can still modify and re-place nodes that have
>>> been removed from the dom, but not on nodes that have been destroyed.
>>>
>>> <div id="bar"><p>hi</p><p>there</p></div>
>>>
>>> var ps = $("#bar p").remove();
>>> $("#bar").html("<p>hmm</p>");
>>> ps.appendTo("#bar")
>>>
>>> or some such.
>>>
>>
>> Removed from the DOM via an innerHTML or removed from the DOM via a
>> removeChild - the result is the same either way. A reference to the DOM
>> element should be maintained so that further operations can be performed.
>>
>> --John
>>
>>
>> >>
>>
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"jQuery Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to jquery-dev@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
